INTRODUCTION
The first quarter of 2025 delivered a harsh wake-up call for crypto investors worldwide. After a promising rally in late 2024, the digital asset market saw an aggressive correction that erased billions in market capitalization within weeks. Bitcoin, Ethereum, and a range of popular altcoins like Solana, Avalanche, and Polygon suffered significant drawdowns—some losing over 50% from their local highs.
Behind this crash lies a confluence of macroeconomic stress, aggressive monetary tightening, profit-taking behaviors, and a fragile sentiment among both institutional and retail investors. Meanwhile, certain altcoins—particularly those associated with AI, DePIN, and RWA narratives—displayed relative resilience or served as strategic rotation plays amid the broader bloodbath.
This article explores the key catalysts behind the Q1 2025 crypto crash, breaks down performance data across major sectors and tokens, and provides actionable insights for navigating volatile market phases in the months ahead.
Maker (MKR)
Introduction & Use Case: Maker (rebranded to Sky Protocol in 2025) is one of the oldest DeFi projects, originally created to issue the DAI stablecoin backed by crypto collateral. It consists of two tokens: MKR (governance) and DAI (stablecoin)messari.io. The protocol enables users to lock assets (like ETH) as collateral and mint DAI, bringing stability and lending services to DeFi. With the recent rebrand, MKR holders can convert to a new SKY governance token at a fixed ratio, marking a major ecosystem transitionmessari.iomessari.io. Maker serves DeFi users needing stable value (DAI) and governance participants who run the protocol.
Core Fundamentals: Maker runs on Ethereum (recently switched to Proof-of-Stake), so it inherits Ethereum’s consensus and scalability limits. Governance is entirely on-chain: MKR/SKY holders vote on risk parameters, collateral types, and upgrades via MakerDAO’s DAO. Maker’s tokenomics featured a fixed max supply (1 million MKR). In practice 604k MKR are circulating today (60% of max)coincodex.com. Maker is unusual: its annual “inflation” is negative (–35% last year) as system fees burned MKRcoincodex.com, making MKR deflationary when the protocol is busy. There is no staking reward for MKR; instead MKR is mainly used to recapitalize DAI if needed. Core strengths include multi-collateral DAI (supporting many assets) and deep DeFi integration (DAI is widely used in lending, AMMs, etc).
Recent Performance & On-Chain Data: MKR’s price has been volatile. It peaked above $3,000 in early 2024 before retracing to about $1,450 by late 2024. (This is seen on CoinMarketCap charts – maker’s price 52-week range was roughly $827–$3,117coincodex.com.) The token’s market cap is ~$1.2B, and by June 2025 MKR trades around $1,900 (down from last cycle highs). Volatility has been high (e.g. ~10% 30d volatilitycoincodex.com) as DeFi booms and crises moved markets. On-chain activity around Maker/Dai is steady: DAI circulation grew strongly, and governance participation (votes, proposals) remains active. Developer activity has been robust as well: MakerDAO’s GitHub shows continual commits (recent work on “Sky” upgrades). While Luno has only recently listed MKR, demand is driven by Malaysian DeFi interest; we do not have Luno-specific volume data yet.
Ecosystem Growth & Outlook: Maker has a mature community and ecosystem. The MakerDAO community includes active governance forums and core dev teams. Enterprise use is limited (Maker is open DeFi, not enterprise software), but DAI is integrated into many chains and platforms globally. Strategically, Maker’s shift to the Sky Protocol is aimed at improving scalability and incentives (e.g. new reward structures). The Malaysian context: DAI is recognized globally as a stable asset, and Sky/MKR listings on Luno give Malaysian users regulated access. There’s no specific Southeast Asia adoption advantage beyond general DeFi growth – except that Maker’s regulators (the project is Cayman-based) have complied with international rules.
Price Predictions: Technical models and forecasts suggest a range of outcomes. For 6 months (~Dec 2025), one forecast (CoinCodex) predicts MKR could rise to ~$2,595 (+35%)coincodex.com. A conservative scenario might see MKR around $2,000 (roughly current levels) if markets stagnate. For 1 year, MKR could trade in the $2,500–$3,000 range in a bullish case, driven by continued DeFi growth and Sky adoption. The 3-year target is more speculative. CoinCodex long-term analysis envisions MKR in the $6,500–$7,300 range by 2030coincodex.com (this would require strong DeFi cycles). Bearish risks include stronger regulation on stablecoins, DAI pegs depegging during crises, or a failure of the Sky migration (technical bugs, low conversion). Bull case catalysts include widespread use of DAI, further Layer-2 scaling on Ethereum (reducing fees for Maker users), and any institutional adoption of DAI. Macro factors like a new crypto bull market or legal clarity for DeFi could propel MKR; conversely, crypto winters or regulatory bans on lending/stablecoins could push it down.
Aave (AAVE)
Introduction & Use Case: Aave is a leading open-source DeFi lending protocol that enables users to borrow and lend crypto assets. It runs on Ethereum (as an ERC-20 token) and on several Layer-2 networks (e.g. Avalanche, Arbitrum)messari.io. Users can deposit assets to earn interest or borrow against them; interest rates adjust algorithmically. AAVE (the token) serves as protocol governance (holders vote on proposals) and as a safety module stake (risk fund). Aave’s mission is to provide decentralized liquidity across chains, serving DeFi users and institutions seeking permissionless lending.
Core Fundamentals: Aave leverages Ethereum’s Proof-of-Stake consensus and secures its smart contracts through audits. The protocol is permissionless and open-source. Governance is done via Aave’s DAO: AAVE holders vote on risk parameters, new assets, and upgrades. For scalability, Aave has expanded to high-throughput chains (Avalanche, Optimism, Arbitrum, Polygon, etc.), meaning faster transactions at low cost.
-
Tokenomics: AAVE has a fixed max supply of 16 million tokens (15.2 M circulating)messari.io. Its initial launch in 2020 was deflationary: early fees and buyback programs burned tokens. Aave has no inflation (new issuance) now. Instead, AAVE can be burned through protocol fee mechanisms (e.g. on specific governance decisions). Staking AAVE in the Safety Module provides around 5–8% yield (depending on the Safety Incentives)aave.com. AAVE’s token utility is mainly governance voting and capturing protocol revenue, not as a “work token.”
-
Integrations & Strengths: Aave is integrated into major DeFi ecosystems: other protocols often use Aave’s liquidity (e.g. stablecoin projects lend on Aave for yield). Recently Aave introduced its own stablecoin (GHO) to further token demand. It also partners with DeFi aggregators and wallets. Aave’s main strength is its multi-chain presence and high Total Value Locked (TVL). Notably, Aave has backing by large crypto firms and a respected DAO structure.
Recent Performance & On-Chain Data: Over the past 6–12 months, AAVE’s price has been relatively stable-to-bullish. It has traded generally between $200–$300, recently around $260 as of mid-2025coincodex.com. CoinCodex’s technical model predicts a ~14% rise by mid-2025 to about $291coincodex.com (it marked current sentiment as bullish). On-chain, Aave’s usage remains strong: its smart contracts show hundreds of millions in deposits, with renewed interest after DeFi summer-like rallies. Developer activity is sustained (Aave’s GitHub shows steady commits, especially for V3 features). The number of unique wallets interacting with Aave (suppliers and borrowers) has seen occasional spikes, for example when new collateral is added. Luno usage data is not publicly available, but as a regulated exchange listing AAVE, we expect Malaysian traders to increase volumes.
Ecosystem Growth & Outlook: Aave’s ecosystem is active. The Aave DAO has numerous working groups (e.g. on risk, safety, research). Aave’s community participation (governance turnout) remains robust. Institutional interest is growing: e.g. larger firms are exploring lending on Aave (and Aave DAO itself is developing an institutional-grade liquidity product). In Asia, Aave Labs (the entity behind Aave) is engaged with regulators and fintech partners. However, there’s no specific Malaysian tie. Globally, the outlook is strong: Aave benefits from broader DeFi expansion, especially if crypto loans gain mainstream recognition. Southeast Asia sees increasing crypto adoption, so regulated access via Luno may boost Aave’s local uptake. Regulatory challenges (e.g. lending being scrutinized) are a caution.
Price Predictions: Technical forecasts suggest moderate upside. CoinCodex predicts AAVE reaching ~$291 by July 2025 (up ~14%)coincodex.com. Thus a 6-month target near $290–$300 is plausible in a bullish case; a bearish case might keep it near $230–$250 if markets are flat. For 1 year (~mid-2026), bullish analysts have AAVE around $350–$400 (assuming broad crypto uptrend and Aave adoption), while bears see it around $200–$250. For 3 years (~2030), some models project AAVE could be ~$650–$720coincodex.com, which is roughly +150% from today. Risk factors include DeFi regulation (if lending is restricted), smart contract exploits, or loss of market share to other lending protocols. Bull catalysts: continued DeFi growth, expansion of Aave V3 features (like high-efficiency pools), introduction of new markets (and GHO uptake), and possibly ETF-like products. A macro tailwind (e.g. crypto bull market) would also lift AAVE; conversely, broad bear markets or Ethereum network issues could keep AAVE subdued.
Algorand (ALGO)
Introduction & Use Case: Algorand is a high-performance Layer-1 blockchain designed for quick, secure and green transactionsalgorand.co. Founded by cryptography pioneer Silvio Micali, Algorand’s goal is to enable a borderless economy and support decentralized applications (dApps) – particularly in finance and assets. ALGO is the native token used for transactions, staking, and governance participation. Use cases include fast payments (the chain can settle nearly instantly), tokenization of assets (like stablecoins and NFTs), and DeFi apps. Notably, Algorand is used by projects like PlanetWatch (environmental data), Republic of Marshall Islands (their digital sovereign currency), and various blockchain startups.
Core Fundamentals: Algorand uses a Pure Proof-of-Stake (PPoS) consensus that randomly selects validators – giving every token holder a chance to propose or vote on blocks. This yields sub-3 second finality and high throughput (potentially ~10,000 TPS)algorand.co. Scalability is strong by design: the network can finalize blocks almost instantly with negligible fees. Algorand’s governance is run through the Algorand Foundation, which guides protocol upgrades via community input. On-chain governance allows ALGO stakers to vote on improvement proposals.
-
Tokenomics: Algorand’s max supply is 10 billion ALGO, planned to be fully issued by 2030coinmarketcap.com. As of mid-2025, about ~6.7 billion ALGO are circulatingcoinmarketcap.com. Algorand is inflationary but with fixed issuance: roughly 10B by 2030coinmarketcap.com. Currently, ALGO holders can stake their tokens (participation nodes or by delegating) and earn ~5–6% annual yieldcoinmarketcap.com. No coins have been burned yet, and no deflationary mechanism is in place. Token distribution was planned to reward ecosystem growth (seed investors, founders, and development).
-
Integrations & Strengths: Algorand is known for fast, low-cost transactions (minimal 0.001 ALGO fee) and sustainability (low energy use). Key partnerships include Circle (issuing USDC stablecoin on Algorand), the Republic of the Marshall Islands (Marshallcoin), and various enterprise blockchain consortia. The Algorand network supports smart contracts (TEAL) and has Layer-1 features for asset issuance. Notable projects on Algorand include Yieldly (DeFi), Rand Labs R&D, and startup accelerators. Technology strengths are its speed, finality and ASIC-resistant design.
Recent Performance & On-Chain Data: ALGO’s price has struggled in bear markets but shows recovery signs. In the past year it traded roughly between $0.12 and $0.20. (For example, as of June 2025 it trades near $0.17.) Analysts at CCN predict a range of $0.12–$0.66 for 2025, reflecting uncertaintyccn.com. Volatility remains high for a L1 token. On-chain metrics: transaction volume and active addresses are steady (Algorand explorer shows millions of accounts). Developer activity (GitHub commits) is consistent, with major updates like Algorand 3.0 and new SDKs. There have been bursts of on-chain activity when new apps launch, but no single breakout event. We haven’t seen Luno-specific volume data, but Algorand’s listing likely appeals to Malaysian users interested in scalable smart-contract chains.
Ecosystem Growth & Outlook: Algorand has a committed developer community (Algorand Foundation and hackathons) and growing DeFi ecosystem (though still small vs ETH). Institutional interest includes projects tokenizing bonds, real estate, and enterprise use cases in finance. For example, Iceland’s innovation center is exploring asset on Algorand. In Malaysia/Asia, Algorand Foundation has partnerships (e.g. with Malaysia Digital Economy Corporation), which could boost local awareness. Strategically, Algorand is often highlighted for central bank digital currency (CBDC) trials and sustainability (Malaysia has green tech focus). Community-wise, Algorand often emphasizes governance via its foundation’s participatory design.
Price Predictions: Forecasts for ALGO are mixed. CCN’s analysis suggests a potential rally to ~$0.66 by end of 2025 (bull case)ccn.com; conservative models have it around $0.12-$0.20. For 6 months (~Dec 2025), a bullish target might be $0.30–$0.40 (reflecting improved DeFi use); a bear scenario would keep it at $0.10–$0.15. One-year out, if crypto markets recover strongly, ALGO could reach $0.5–$0.6; a flat market might only see $0.2–$0.3. For 3 years (~2028), optimistic forecasts (based on broad crypto growth and algorand adoption) range from $1 up to several dollarsccn.com. Risk factors include competition from other L1s (Solana, Avalanche, BNB), any failure to attract apps, or disappointing transaction growth. Bull catalysts: further real-world asset issuances on Algorand, major dApp launches (e.g. in DeFi/NFT), and continued protocol upgrades (e.g. faster fees, cross-chain bridges). Macro trends (crypto bull runs, CBDC interest) could lift ALGO; conversely, stricter regulations on DeFi or a collapse in market sentiment would weigh it down.
Stellar (XLM)
Introduction & Use Case: Stellar is a decentralized blockchain aimed at fast, low-cost cross-border payments and asset transfer. It was co-founded by Jed McCaleb (Ripple’s co-founder) to serve financial institutions and global remittance needs. XLM (Lumens) is Stellar’s native token, originally used to pay transaction fees and as a bridge currency for exchanges. Stellar’s core use case is to facilitate moving money across borders cheaply – e.g. issuing stablecoins, tokenizing real-world assets (like currencies), and connecting banks. Major early adopters include IBM (World Wire payment network) and other banks. Stellar serves both retail users (via new wallets and apps) and enterprise partners.
Core Fundamentals: Stellar uses the Stellar Consensus Protocol – a federated Byzantine agreement where nodes choose trusted “quorum slices” to confirm transactionsmessari.io. Unlike PoW/PoS, it relies on majority agreement among chosen nodes. This design enables fast ~2-second ledger closes (adjustable), low fees, and energy efficiency (no mining)stellar.orgcoindesk.com. There is no on-chain governance like voting; instead the Stellar Development Foundation (SDF) guides development, and nodes are run by the SDF and validators (often financial orgs). This semi-centralized model means upgrades are coordinated by SDF. In terms of scalability, Stellar can handle hundreds of transactions per second (the network cap is set at 200 TPS by default, though upgrades aim for 5000 TPS)stellar.orgcoindesk.com. Importantly, a new smart-contract platform “Soroban” is being launched to enable more complex DeFi on Stellar (aiming for 5000 TPS, 2.5s finalitycoindesk.com).
-
Tokenomics: XLM has a fixed total supply (~50 billion XLM) after a 2019 supply adjustmentmessari.io. Originally 100B were created, but half was burned and inflation (1% annual) was discontinued. Now no new tokens are issued. Approximately 20–25 billion XLM are circulating today. There is no built-in staking or token yield: holding XLM does not earn interest on-chain. Transaction fees (minuscule 0.00001 XLM per operation) are burned as a spam prevention, providing slight deflation over time.
-
Integrations & Strengths: Stellar’s history is rich in partnerships: IBM used Stellar for cross-border payments (World Wire), and collaborations with KlickEx, Deloitte, and others have been publicized. Stellar excels at tokenized assets: notable launches include Franklin Templeton’s stablecoin fund and Circle’s USDC on Stellar (Circle’s USDC on Stellar reached ~$345M on-chain by May 2025beincrypto.com). Its technology is simple (accounts and payments, plus Soroban smart contracts coming). Stellar is known for very low fees, strong institutional ties, and support for regulated assets (e.g. banking partners can issue securities on Stellar).
Recent Performance & On-Chain Data: Over the past year, XLM’s price was relatively flat or slightly down. For example, one report noted a 52-week high around $0.16 and low ~$0.08 (roughly –18% change)sharlife.my. (As of mid-2025 XLM trades near $0.09.) Volatility has been moderate. On-chain, Stellar has seen significant growth: active accounts grew from 7.2 million in 2023 to 9.5 million by May 2025beincrypto.com. Roughly 5,000 new wallets join each daybeincrypto.com, reflecting steady adoption in developing markets. Transaction volume has benefited from real-world asset tokenization: Total Value of Assets (RWA) on Stellar soared ~84% in early 2025, from $275M to over $500Mbeincrypto.com. However, Stellar’s development pace (Soroban rollout) has been gradual; core ledger usage is currently driven by payments and tokenized assets rather than new DeFi. The network’s ledger and nodes remained robust, though a small number of “whale” accounts hold most XLM (the top 10 wallets hold ~80% of supplybeincrypto.com, a risk for market impact). Luno data is not public, but Malaysian interest may stem from Stellar’s remittance goals and ease of access on Luno.
Ecosystem Growth & Outlook: Stellar’s ecosystem is growing around payments and RWA. Partnerships with Circle (USDC) and Franklin Templeton indicate institutional usage; such RWA integrations show Stellar’s appeal in regulated asset marketsbeincrypto.com. The community scene is active: Soroban (Stellar’s WASM smart-contract platform) has engaged many developers in 2024–25. The SDF has unveiled a public roadmap focusing on scalability and usabilitycoindesk.com. In Southeast Asia, Stellar gained attention in remittance corridors, though no specific Malaysia-based deployment is known. Regulatory-wise, Stellar is generally viewed favorably (SDF works with regulators), and Luno’s approval suggests the Malaysian regulator sees it as a legitimate asset. Risks include its decentralized consensus model (some call it semi-centralized), and market concentration of XLM. But its focus on real-world asset use gives it a niche advantage (e.g. stablecoins, CBDC pilots).
Price Predictions: Analysts’ targets for XLM tend to be modest. With current prices around $0.09, short-term forecasts often show only a slight rise. Some models predict 6-month/1-year prices near $0.10–$0.12 under neutral conditions. A moderately bullish scenario (crypto bull run) might see XLM reach $0.15–$0.18 within a year. A multi-year target (3 years) could be in the $0.20–$0.30 range if Soroban drives utility and RWA use continues. Bearish risks include supply dumping by large holders, or faster alternatives overtaking Stellar’s use cases. Bull factors include increased stablecoin volume, major new financial apps on Soroban, or adoption by Southeast Asian remittance networks. A major macro catalyst (e.g. institutional adoption of tokenized securities) could boost XLM, whereas regulatory crackdowns on token finance could hurt it.
NEAR Protocol (NEAR)
Introduction & Use Case: NEAR Protocol is a sharded, proof-of-stake blockchain designed for developer-friendly dApps and usability. It focuses on scaling through sharding and simplifying user experience (e.g. human-readable accounts). NEAR serves Web3 developers and applications needing fast finality and high throughput. Use cases include DeFi, NFTs, and decentralized identity. The native token NEAR is used for transaction fees, staking by validators, and protocol governance. NEAR aims to be friendly to end-users and integrates natively with a WebAssembly smart-contract environment (and also supports Ethereum-based apps via Aurora, its EVM compatibility layer).
Core Fundamentals: NEAR runs on its own PoS chain using a novel consensus called “Doomslug” combined with “Nightshade” shardingnear.org. Doomslug ensures every block finalizes in one transaction (one-round finality), yielding sub-second finality after epoch. Nightshade divides the network into multiple shards for parallel processing, meaning there is no theoretical throughput limitnear.org. This design provides high TPS and low latency. Governance was initially led by the NEAR Foundation (a Singapore-based nonprofit), guiding upgrades. NEAR recently completed a mainnet “Phase II” making it community-governed, with more delegation from the Foundation.
-
Tokenomics: NEAR had a genesis supply of 1 billion NEARnear.org. Inflation is set at 5% annually: 4.5% goes to validators (via staking rewards) and 0.5% to a protocol treasurynear.org. Transaction fees on NEAR are partially rebated (30% to the contract, 70% burned)near.org, which can make the system deflationary at high usage. There is no max cap; supply grows slowly under the 5% rule. As of mid-2025, circulating supply is on the order of several hundred million (due to lockup unlock schedules) and rising gradually toward 1B. NEAR holders can stake or delegate to validators to earn reward (~10–15% APY currently, depending on stake conditions).
-
Integrations & Strengths: NEAR’s ecosystem includes an EVM-compatible Aurora chain (so Ethereum apps can run on NEAR with speed) and a cross-chain Rainbow Bridge. Developer tooling is a strength: it has intuitive SDKs and web-friendly account model. Partnerships include working with Oasis Labs on privacy, Coinbase Cloud node support, and various hackathons globally. NEAR’s strengths are its scalability, ease of use (no account setup for users), and promising throughput (~1000 TPS shards scaling out). It’s also considered friendly for enterprise due to predictable fees and fast finality.
Recent Performance & On-Chain Data: NEAR’s price trend has been mixed. In mid-2024 NEAR traded around $1.5–$3.0; as of June 2025 it is around $2.19coincodex.com, reflecting 50–100% swings. CoinCodex predicts ~+$0.42 (19.8%) to $2.61 in 6 monthscoincodex.com. On-chain, NEAR’s network use has grown: block times have been reduced and shards increased (recent upgrades cut block time to ~1.2s)messari.io. Developer activity is robust (NEAR ranks high on GitHub for commit count among layer-1s). Wallet growth is solid – millions of accounts – driven by global hackathons. Transactions per day have grown moderately with new apps. We lack specific Malaysian data, but NEAR’s use of WebAssembly and simple UX could appeal to developers in the region.
Ecosystem Growth & Outlook: NEAR boasts a vibrant developer community and a range of apps (DeFi platforms like Ref Finance, Aurora DEXes, NFT marketplaces). It has significant venture funding (e.g. backed by Pantera, A16Z) fueling ecosystem grants. Institutional interest includes projects in gaming and identity (NEAR’s Nightshade for gaming is rumored). Asia-focused growth: NEAR has key contributors (e.g. from India, Bangladesh) and Foundation initiatives in the region. Regulatory-wise, NEAR has worked under legal frameworks of its foundation. The network’s upgrade roadmap (sharding improvements, Ethereum compatibility) promises more throughput and utility. On the downside, NEAR faces heavy competition from other L1s (Solana, Polygon). Its success hinges on maintaining performance and attracting developers.
Price Predictions: NEAR’s medium-term targets look moderately bullish. A CoinCodex forecast sees ~20% upside to $2.61 by mid-2025coincodex.com. So a 6-month target might be ~$2.6 in a bull case, or ~ $1.8 in a bear case. For 1 year, a bullish outcome might get NEAR to $3–$4, with bearish around $1–$2. By 3 years, if NEAR captures significant market share, some models project $5–$7coincodex.com (CoinCodex chart shows 2030 avg ~$6.37coincodex.com). Risk factors include competitor chains, any sharding issues, or funding drying up. Bull cases: mass adoption of dApps (especially via Aurora/EVM bridge), continued network scaling, and macro tailwinds for crypto. Regulatory clarity (or favorable laws for Web3) would help; unfavorable regulation or a loss of developer confidence would hinder growth.
Hedera Hashgraph (HBAR)
Introduction & Use Case: Hedera Hashgraph is a public network using a patented directed acyclic graph (“hashgraph”) consensus rather than a traditional blockchain. It targets enterprise use cases: identity, supply chain, tokenized assets, and micropayments. HBAR is the native token used for securing the network (staking), paying for transactions, and incentivizing network participants. Hedera’s unique selling point is high throughput and low fees at enterprise scale, combined with governance by a council of global corporations (e.g. Google, IBM, LG)benzinga.com. It aims to serve businesses and large-scale apps rather than general DeFi.
Core Fundamentals: Consensus on Hedera is asynchronous Byzantine Fault Tolerance (aBFT) via hashgraph, which achieves very fast finality and theoretically unlimited throughput (thousands of TPS)benzinga.com. There are no mining forks; nodes gossip and then virtual voting finalizes transactions rapidly. Governance is permissioned: only council members (up to 39 global organizations) can run consensus nodes and vote on network changes. While this yields stability and trust for enterprises, it means Hedera is less decentralized than pure blockchains. Scalability is a core strength: Hedera claims thousands of TPS with sub-second finality and energy efficiency (low electricity usage).
-
Tokenomics: HBAR had a maximum supply of 50 billion (all minted at launch); the supply is fixed and no new tokens are issued. Circulating supply is controlled by the Hedera Treasury and council. HBAR itself is used as gas (tiny amounts) and for staking and governance (nodes must stake HBAR). There is currently no inflation. The Hedera Council periodically unlocks portions of supply for ecosystem incentives, but as of now HBAR is mostly in circulation or treasury. No native staking yield was offered initially, but the network now plans staking (deferred until governance permits). In short: supply is capped at 50B, and HBAR’s value accrues via network usage fees (which are mostly burns) and scarcity.
-
Integrations & Strengths: Hedera’s main appeal is its corporate-backed model. It has direct partnerships via council members and projects building on it (e.g. TV network CNBC experimented with Hedera for identity). Its tech strengths: high TPS, no forks, built-in Oracle and Identity services. It also supports Solidity contracts. Notable partnerships include Hedera’s governance by Google Cloud, Boeing, Audi, etc., and deals like Walker Sands’s dApp accelerator. Another plus is the Hedera Token Service (HTS) for fast token creation on-chain.
Recent Performance & On-Chain Data: HBAR’s price has lagged other tokens; it trades around $0.15 in mid-2025benzinga.com. Recent history shows volatility: it spiked in 2021 to ~$0.50 then crashed, and has mostly been rangebound ~ $0.05–$0.20. Benzinga’s aggregation of forecasts indicates a cautious outlook: e.g. 2025 avg ~$0.151 (+15%)benzinga.com, possibly dropping slightly in 2026benzinga.com. On-chain, Hedera’s usage is growing in select sectors, but overall transaction counts remain modest compared to other L1s. However, Hashgraph’s performance is proven: millions of transactions processed per week internally. Developer activity is smaller than mainstream blockchains, but includes a growing ecosystem (DeFi app agreements and NFT art). Luno’s listing may boost trading volume locally, but corporate clients of Hedera are mostly global.
Ecosystem Growth & Outlook: Hedera’s ecosystem is unique: over 500 million accounts (wallets) exist, mostly due to airdrops (often social campaign wallets). However, many accounts are inactive (top 10 wallets hold 90% of supplybeincrypto.com). Enterprise usage is encouraged through council projects; Hedera focuses on use cases like digital identity (govtech pilots), carbon credits, supply chain (e.g. Traceto.io using Hedera for tracking). It has explicit regional ties: its governing council includes members in Asia (e.g. LG, Network18 in India). In Malaysia/SEA context, no major initiatives are public, but Hedera’s global corporate ties (e.g. LG) signal interest in Asia. Regulatory perspective: Hedera managed to get token approvals in several jurisdictions (including SEC settlements in USA), and its council-governed structure may appease regulators.
Price Predictions: Forecasts for HBAR are very conservative. One analysis expects 2025 price to average only ~$0.151benzinga.com (≈15% above current). By late 2025/6 months, a bullish scenario might see $0.18 (as Changelly predicted ~$0.1828 by Aug 2025), but bearish cases have it sliding toward $0.10–$0.12 if adoption stalls. For 1 year, HBAR could be flat-to-slight-up ($0.15–$0.20) in base case; only extreme bull cases (major corporate launches) push it above $0.25. By 3 years (~2028), even Binance’s user consensus suggests only ~$0.11binance.com. (Benzinga notes forecasts as high as $0.106 by 2030, and as low as $0.039benzinga.com, indicating wide skepticism.) Key risks: if enterprises continue to use Hedera off-chain (via private accounts) instead of spending HBAR, demand will stay lowbenzinga.com. Also, being permissioned could reduce crypto investor appeal. Bull cases hinge on widespread real usage (e.g. a major country issuing a digital asset on Hedera, or global IoT deployments using Hashgraph). Macro catalysts might include corporate blockchain trends, while bear catalysts include crypto bear markets or any loss of council cohesion.
Synthetix (SNX)
Introduction & Use Case: Synthetix is a decentralized protocol on Ethereum that enables creation of synthetic assets (synths) – tokens that track the value of real-world or crypto assets (e.g. sUSD, sBTC). SNX is the governance and staking token. SNX holders stake their tokens as collateral to mint synths, providing liquidity to the system. Users can trade synths on Synthetix Exchange, accessing assets like stocks, fiat, and crypto directly on-chain. Synthetix is aimed at traders wanting exposure to various assets without intermediaries.
Core Fundamentals: Consensus is Ethereum PoS (Synthetix runs on Ethereum layer-1 and on Optimism L2 for cheaper transactions). Governance is decentralized: SNX holders vote on SIPs (protocol improvement proposals) via a DAO. The network is highly permissionless – anyone can create a synth by staking SNX and accepting debt risk. Scalability has been a challenge: original Synthetix (2019-2021) was fully on Ethereum, but congestion was an issue. It shifted heavily to Optimism (and recently focusing back on L1) to improve speed and reduce fees.
-
Tokenomics: SNX originally had inflationary tokenomics to encourage staking: new SNX were minted as staking rewards (peaked in single digits APY) until 2023blog.synthetix.io. However, as of December 2023, Synthetix ended its inflation (via SIP 2043)blog.synthetix.io. Now no new SNX are issued; instead, trading fees and protocol revenue are used for potential buyback-and-burn strategies. Circulating supply is ~300 million SNX (Max was 262M initially, but inflation meant more in 2024). It’s a high-staking model: roughly two-thirds of SNX can be staked in pools. Yield on SNX was very high (hundreds of % APY) when inflationary rewards were in place, but now is more moderate (depending on trading volume and the new reward structure).
-
Integrations & Strengths: Synthetix is unique in DeFi: it offers a wide range of synthetic assets (crypto, commodities, ETFs) without counterparties. Its main strength is deep liquidity for large market exposure on-chain. It integrates with Curve and Uniswap for trading: for instance, SNX stakers get LP rewards on Curve as part of the veSNX program. Synthetix also partners with cross-chain bridges (Avalanche) and has upcoming integrations with exchanges. Technology-wise, Synthetix pioneered cross-asset collateral use in DeFi and led the way in leveraging L2s (one of the first major apps on Optimism).
Recent Performance & On-Chain Data: SNX has been very volatile. In late 2023 it spiked to ~$5.00 (partly due to excitement over a plans and the rise of L2 tokens) but then crashed – it’s now around $0.58 (mid-2025)kraken.com. In fact, SNX is down ~70% year-on-year (Kraken notes last year’s high ~$3.40 vs recent low ~$0.56)kraken.com. The collapse was due to deflationary changes and broader market declines. On-chain, SNX staking remains high (over two-thirds of supply is staked in the main “420 pool”). Trading volume on Synthetix Exchange (and Layer-2 AMMs) fluctuates with crypto market sentiment. Developer activity is significant: the team has released major updates (e.g. Perps V3, and indeed the recent “Andromeda” upgrade for multi-chain). Wallet activity (unique addresses interacting with Synthetix) grows when new synths or incentives launch, but is modest relative to giants like Ethereum. Malaysian or Luno-specific usage is unlikely to be notable yet; Synthetix’s user base is global and DeFi-focused.
Ecosystem Growth & Outlook: The Synthetix community (called the Spartan Council) is highly engaged in governance and development. Many DeFi protocols use Synthetix synths as liquidity (for example, integrating sUSD in their pools). Institutional (or at least enterprise) adoption of Synthetix’s unique assets is nascent, but could emerge if tokenized stocks or commodities on-chain take off. Technically, Synthetix’s move to Phase II (ending inflation) signals maturity. It also plans more Layer-2 deployments (the “Andromeda” upgrade will use multiple rollups). The main risk is competition: other synthetic asset projects (e.g. UMA) exist, but Synthetix’s liquidity has been a moat. Geographically, DeFi interest in Asia is growing, but Synthetix has no special ties to Malaysia. Still, regulatory clarity on synthetic assets (like if they are considered securities) will be important.
Price Predictions: Forecasts for SNX range widely due to its volatility. Botsfolio aggregated some models: Changelly suggests SNX reaching ~$2.07–$2.45 by 2025botsfolio.com (a ~3-4x from today), whereas others like Binance predicted only ~$2.07 by end-2025. For 6 months, a bullish outlook might see SNX around $1.00–$1.50 if market sentiment recovers; a bear case could keep it under $0.50. For 1 year, SNX could range $2.00–$3.00 in a bull scenario (rallying with DeFi recovery), or remain under $1.00 if markets stay weak. 3 years out, one Changelly estimate (via Botsfolio) is ~$14 by 2030botsfolio.com, but that is extremely bullish and unlikely without major adoption. Risks include low usage (since SNX value largely comes from synth trading fees), regulatory action (synthetic assets could attract scrutiny), and competition. Bull catalysts: booming crypto markets that drive trading fees, new high-APY synths encouraging staking, and growth of perps markets. Also, technical improvements (multi-chain expansion) could reignite investor interest. Macros like crypto adoption and fintech trends might help; bears include any DeFi crackdowns or a permanent downturn in crypto valuations.
The Graph (GRT)
Introduction & Use Case: The Graph is a decentralized indexing protocol for querying blockchain data (using GraphQL). It enables developers to easily access on-chain data (like transaction history, smart contract states) without running their own nodes. By creating subgraphs (schemas defining data of interest), apps (especially DeFi dApps) can query large amounts of data reliably. GRT is the utility token: Indexers stake GRT to provide indexing services, Curators stake GRT to signal valuable subgraphs, and Delegators stake GRT to Indexers. Use cases include any application needing blockchain data – e.g. DeFi dashboards, NFT marketplaces, social dApps. Essentially, The Graph serves blockchain developers and data consumers.
Core Fundamentals: The Graph Network runs on Ethereum (with an emerging multichain design). Consensus and security are inherited from Ethereum (PoS). The Graph’s protocol is its core: it rewards node operators who index data and serve queries. Governance is on-chain: GRT holders vote on upgrades (managed by the Graph Foundation). Scalability is achieved by sharding the indexers and caches; the network is designed to handle massive query loads. (Recent optimizations and a move to Arbitrum L2 have improved performancemessari.io.)
-
Tokenomics: GRT had an initial max supply of 10 billion (with inflation of ~3.4% annually). Part of GRT fees (10%) are burned when indexers get query fees. As of now, circulating supply is ~9.8B. There is some inflation (around 3% per year) that goes to treasury and network funding. Staking GRT in the Network can earn around 5–8% APY from indexer rewards (though returns vary). Overall, GRT’s economy is roughly balanced: part of each query fee goes to indexers and part to the treasury, plus inflation. Key metrics (from Messari Q3 2024): query fees hit all-time highs ($206k USD in Q3’24) and indexed queries hit ~5.3B that quartermessari.io. This shows robust growth.
-
Integrations & Strengths: The Graph is integrated with all major blockchains: Ethereum, Arbitrum, Polygon, Solana, etc., and indexes any chain with a subgraph. It’s the de facto standard for on-chain data; major projects like Uniswap, Aave, and Sushiswap rely on The Graph. Recent partnerships include integration with Sony’s Soneium and SubQuery for Polkadot datamessari.io. Its main strength is that it offloads costly data infrastructure from developers. Technologically, The Graph is battle-tested (launched in 2018) and has a growing infrastructure of indexers and curators. A key development: The Graph fully transitioned from Ethereum L1 hosting to Arbitrum L2 in Q3’24, boosting efficiencymessari.io.
Recent Performance & On-Chain Data: GRT’s token price has been rangebound/slightly down. It traded around $0.10 in mid-2025. Some reports mention it “climbed in late 2024 but has since fallen”ccn.com. On-chain usage, however, is booming: Q3’24 saw 5.3 billion queries (79% QoQ increase) and new subgraphs hit 10,400 (up 42% QoQ)messari.io. Fees have increased accordingly (83% QoQ to $206k). These trends continued into 2025 with more networks on-boarded (e.g. more chains and subgraph adoption). Developer activity is high: thousands of subgraphs have moved to The Graph Network (decentralized indexing). The community is active (Graph governance proposals and grants). There’s no specific Malaysia tie; usage is global. Luno listing may help local developers who rely on indexed data to easily trade GRT and possibly set up local infrastructure.
Ecosystem Growth & Outlook: The Graph community is robust. Its developer/adopter base spans Ethereum DeFi and beyond. Institutions have also noticed The Graph: for example, Nasdaq’s crypto index provider is exploring using Graph data. The Graph Foundation runs grants and hackathons. New product developments include The Graph staking (launching in 2024), which will incentivize delegators. Geographically, The Graph has strong presence in North America and Europe; Asia adoption is growing as more dApps launch. Regulatory advantages: indexing data is not controversial, so GRT has avoided major legal issues. The recent surge in query volume suggests network effects: as DeFi and Web3 apps expand, demand for The Graph’s service will continue. That said, The Graph will face competition from centralized API providers and emerging indexers on other tech stacks.
Price Predictions: Price forecasts for GRT tend to be conservative. For the near term, predictions are modest: e.g. Binance’s user consensus expects ~+$0.02 by 2030 (to ~$0.1086)binance.com. A 6-month target might be around $0.10 (little change) in a neutral scenario; a bullish case might see $0.15 if crypto demand rises and staking launches. For 1 year, some see $0.15–$0.20 (assuming growth continues); bearish outlooks see sub-$0.10. For 3 years, BlockDAG’s analysis (which may be optimistic) projects GRT around $2.32 by 2030blockdag.network, but more mainstream views expect under $0.50 or lower (since The Graph’s usage is only one piece of crypto growth). Risk factors include technical issues (indexer downtime), falling crypto market volumes (which would lower query fees), or new competitor index protocols. Bull factors: explosive growth in blockchain apps (requiring indexing), the launch of staking rewards (driving speculative demand), and integration in meta-layer projects (like blockchain analytics tools). A macro tailwind for GRT would be a broad decentralization of data infrastructure in tech; bearish would be any downturn in crypto development or interest in on-chain data.
CONCLUSION
The crypto market’s sharp decline in Q1 2025 reinforces a core truth of this high-stakes asset class: volatility is not a bug—it’s a feature. While painful, these corrections are essential in cleansing excesses, shaking out weak hands, and setting the stage for the next growth cycle. The current environment favors caution, strategic rotation, and a reallocation toward quality assets backed by strong narratives or real-world adoption.
As history has shown, every crash carries embedded opportunities. The tokens and narratives that demonstrate resilience—such as AI, DePIN, and tokenized RWAs—could be early indicators of where capital will flow in the next cycle. For forward-looking investors, this is not just a time to survive, but to position smartly for the inevitable rebound.
Disclaimer:
This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Always perform your research and consult a professional before making trading or investment decisions.
Join Bybit Now!
0 Comments
Post a Comment